ABUJA— The controversies over how a 200 level student of
Mass Communication Department in Cross River State University of Science and
Technology, CRUTEC, Joy Odama, allegedly died in the house of one Alhaji Usman
Adamu in Abuja, continued yesterday as the Police Force Headquarters released
another autopsy report.
The first autopsy report from the National Hospital, Abuja,
made available to her family revealed that Joy Odama died of acute cocaine
poisoning. However, the Police, yesterday, said contrary to that report, Joy
died of generator fumes in Alhaji Adamu’s house.
Meanwhile, the Police, at a briefing by Force Public
Relations Officer, Jimoh Moshood, failed to parade Adamu, the prime suspect,
unlike other times when suspects were always paraded before newsmen to see and
possibly ask probing questions.
Family kicks
Reacting to the latest Police report that Odama died of
generator fumes, the family flayed the Police authorities, saying the latter
was being economical with the truth, insisting that their daughter died of
cocaine infusion as shown in the first autopsy report.
The family of the deceased wondered why the police was
shielding the suspect. President, Basic Rights Enlightenment Foundation, BREF,
Augustine Okechukwu, reacting on behalf of the family, said: “We are not aware
if the suspect is in police custody.
“We doubt the claim by the Police that Alhaji Adamu is in
its custody. Why can’t the police for once parade him for people to see?” On
the autopsy result, he said: “I was there when the police conducted the second
autopsy, but they refused to give us the final results when it came out.”
It’ll go to court—Police
However, in reaction to the allegations, Force Public
Relations Officer, Deputy Superintendent Jimoh Moshood, said: “We don’t have
any contradictions with regard to what we have said. The issue of murder is a
capital offence, which cannot be compromised at any level; it has to go to
court.
“Anybody has the right to go to court to table any
grievances that they might have observed or felt had happened in the course of
the investigation into the matter. “I want to assure you that what the police
have done is a very thorough job that can stand the test of trial in court
against the accused person.
As I speak, the accused person is still in Police custody
and that is very important to everyone to ensure that justice is done.”
New report not exonerating suspect—FPPRO
Moshood noted that the first autopsy report was not rejected
by the police, but that it was inconclusive, noting that it was why the
Inspector General of Police had to order for another autopsy to be done. He
added that the report does not exonerate the suspect in question and the
general public should dissociate themselves from the conflicting reports.
His words: “I want to say that we did not reject the first
autopsy report. The first autopsy report was not conclusive. “In fact, Dr. Paul
Jubril (doctor that conducted first autopsy) equally witnessed the second
autopsy report examination.
“The report of the second autopsy is not exonerating the suspect and that is what is important. The prosecution will still go ahead. We should disabuse our mind of any conflicting view as to whether Police is out to exonerate the principal suspect in this regard.”
Vanguard Report.